Discussion about this post

User's avatar
James Higgins's avatar

Thanks Ian, very good read. The European Union should return to its roots as an economic union, restore some kind of relationship with Russia, and use Russian energy to rebuild their industries. I know that it won’t happen with the current leadership. It boggles the mind, but we’re seeing the same thing in the US. The Trump promises to end foreign adventures and focus on domestic affairs is crumbling under the influence of the military industrial complex and its allies.

Expand full comment
Kautilya The Contemplator's avatar

Sharp piece, I’d add one structural wrinkle that accelerates the trend you describe which is Europe’s fiscal-industrial "trilemma". Governments are trying to do three expensive things at once. First, sustain support for Ukraine. Second, rebuild a de-industrialized energy base and third, cushion households from stagnant real incomes - all under hard constraints (Germany’s debt brake, France’s rising interest bill, the UK’s gilt sensitivity). When financing costs rise, “guns” crowd out both “butter” and the capex needed to re-shore industry. Voters aren’t just turning nationalist on identity. They’re prioritizing factories, grids, and wages over foreign commitments.

Two watchpoints that will signal how fast policy shifts:

1. Sovereign funding stress in the form of missed bond targets, emergency mini-budgets and clawbacks from social programs (rumblings of which we are seeing through recent announcements by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz).

2. Industrial indicators such as power-price volatility, announced plant closures/relocations and stalled hydrogen/SMR timelines.

If those worsen while Kiev seeks another major tranche in 2026, mainstream parties face a sharper correction not just at the ballot box but in coalition math and EU unanimity thereby making a negotiated end more politically inevitable even if leaders resist it in the short run.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts